|
Conventional
Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains an excellent treatment method
for elderly, relatively inactive patients with hip arthritis.
THR has been proven over many years and for the majority of
hip arthritis sufferers this procedure will remain the treatment
of choice.
Hip resurfacing
with a metal/metal articulation shows great promise for the
category of hip arthritis sufferers, who are not good candidates
for THR, namely younger and more active patients.
Derek McMinn
FRCS and Ronan Treacy FRCS have initiated the modern era of
hip resurfacing. It must be recognized however that the resurfacing
procedure is not proven in the long term, with their maximum
follow-up at the time of writing 9 years 2 months (Feb' 91).
Large numbers of patients have only been treated over the past
6 years 1 month (Since Mar' 94) with the hybrid fixed components.
At this
time therefore, for an individual patient with hip arthritis
they must decide if they are good candidates for conventional
THR on account of age and activity level. If they are good candidates
for THR, then it is unwise to turn away from the proven procedure
of THR and seek treatment with the more experimental procedure
of hip resurfacing, where the long term results are unknown.
In patients
where age and/or activity level make them poor candidates for
conventional THR then the Hip Resurfacing method can reasonally
be considered.
|